Jona knows he isn't good: he says himself he only cares about killing people, not strategizing? Why repeat things everyone knows? 

"Ninki, you're gay! "

Feel free to express your side. I'm just reciting what exactly happened.

Hmm i think its more to the fact I never take a game seriously ,  its way more fun if I don't.  But Maybe we can get some serious balanced matches with the new clan.  

I'm not a noob I just have noob tendencies.

Actually much to my surprise he isn't.  After a year or so of playing with him I only found out he wasn't when he responded to someone a few months ago saying something about desperate housewives and his future girlfriends.  "WTH!"  I exclaimed as he twisted my whole reality. 

I know he isn't. 

So you say jona is good too then?  You were just pointing out misconceptions in your previous post about about ninki being gay and jona not being a good player?  Or is it jona that's gay and ninki is the good player?  Someone needs to clear this up, clearly neither is both.

I was making a joke about Ninki because I knew I could tease him with something like that and it was easily believable, I bet at least a few people think it is true, and I knew he wouldn't be upset by me making a blatantly false accusation. 

Jona is gay ... I think. He at least has called himself a faggot and says it's okay if he uses that word because he is one. 

So...? the second!~ 

But, Jona, you taking the game "not seriously" is frustrating for people who are taking it somewhat more seriously and don't feel like supporting you suicidal self the entire game so you can "get kills". Negative Playing Experience for us and the more we support you doing it, the more frequently you'll continue to do it. 

Hedgie I only do that with UB ,  Orcun does the same thing.  As long as we get a kill it doesnt matter how suicidial i get because ill be unstoppable late game.  Youv'e only played with me like 4 times and always get me when im drunk so of course im gonna play like that lol.

And yes I am gay duhhh.

Indeed - not necessarily the best strat on earth, but it does work AS LONG as ub gets the kill... course the other side of that math is how many players get money for assists and for killing ub.  Plus its reasonably easy to counter as soon as you figure out whether or not you have a suicidal UB on your hands.  But if you can ALWAYS kill SOMEONE on the other team... chase away imo - you become super UB and then good night!

is that why you refuse to play matches unless you think your side has a better chance of victory?

Refer to:  http://www.gamereplays.org/demigod/replays.php?game=51&show=details&id=124489&st=0#post7250064

Your team changed demigods like 12 times and picked prison specifically.. all to have your best chance of walking all over peter for the win (I mean.. occulus to aoe them down, sedna to heal through them, 2 generals to have double monks to heal through them even better, and a ub to tank). 

and the game before where you refused to play with peterdumptruck against kisersosa, but were happy to play with kisersosa against peter.  Stats would say that kiser is the better player.. experience says that peter is the better player.  But you went by stats.. refusing to play.. then happily accepting the switch which led to your downfall.

You might claim to never take a game seriously, but you definitely have, and you've definitely refused to play games until they clearly (at least in your opinion) sided in your favor.  Is taking a game seriously a problem? No.  Is lying about it a problem? Yes.

That's absolute rubbish to accuse that as a team we would try and stack the situation in our favour.

I picked prison because we always played cataract. It wasn't a group decision, it was purely mine.

I picked occulus because if peter were to do the minion trick where he sends them off to the citadel, that's the easiest way of preventing that from happening because the trick works even better on prison. However, we all do that. Whenever I choose a rook, an occulus magically pops up on the other side. I consider it part of the game. The fire tb on your side can do a wonderful job getting rid of Occulus and a Sedna.

I also knew Jona's sedna was not very good, which was something I mentioned to him before we started the game. If anyone has any idea what they're talking about and download the replay it's quite clear it was Sedna who was the weak link - even Jona himself would admit to that so I'm surprised that you would suggest peter to be a viable player based on that replay. His assassin erebus is coming along though, but he needs to get rid of the duelist cirass business.

Rawwr I would love to see you play a cloak of night sedna on prison in 4 second delay lag.  And yes I am a horrible sedna.

^I would say your Sedna is better than your hybrid TB.

Lol are you kidding me Ninki?  You refuse to play any game I'm in unless your team can counter it perfectly.  This whole mess started the night you two refused to play a perfectly balanced game with a pug on each side until you could get Orcun to come in and play, so you could kick the random on your team.  And after you won mostly due to Orcun, Jona started running his mouth again and you joined in.  Then you only started the next game on prison because zen is better than peter and you thought you were set up to perfectly counter his minions. 

Also saying Jona's Sedna is better then his TB is like saying the garbage in the bin in my kitchen is better then the garbage in the bin in my washroom. 

Let's not start. Check my game history and once again, you can go back to hiding your face in shame.